20 Haziran 2012 Çarşamba

What Obama Didn't Advertise About His Amnesty Decision For 800,000 Illegal Immigrants

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

 H/T Hyscience for the pointer to The Daily Caller's Mickey Kaus:

The maddening details of Obama’s DREAM Decree are becoming clearer. As this CIS report notes, 1) The decree doesn’t just apply to illegal immigrants who were “brought to this country by their parents.” It also would give work permits to those who snuck across the border by themselves as teenagers. “Through no fault of their own” is a talking point for DREAM proselytizers, not an actual legal requirement. 2) The same goes for the phrase “and know only this country as home.” That’s a highly imaginative riff on the decree’s actual requirement, which is for 5 years “continuous residence.” It turns out “continuous residence” doesn’t mean what you think it means. “Immigration attorneys have been successful in getting immigration courts to whittle this down to a point where it is almost meaningless,” says CIS’s Jon Feere. As an illegal immigrant you can go back homeabroad for multiple 6-month stints during those five years–but, if precedent holds, in Janet Napolitano’s eyes you will still “know only this country as home.” …

The devil is in the details, huh?


Embedded Eric Holder Letter To Obama Requesting Executive Privilege Be Asserted For Fast and Furious Documents

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

The letter below is what Eric Holder sent to Barack Obama on Tuesday, June 19, 2012, requesting that Obama assert Executive Privilege on "Fast and Furious" documents the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee had issued a subpoena to obtain in their investigation of the failed gun running operation.

(Letter sent to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman asserting Executive Privilege on Fast and Furious documents, found here)


AG Letter to Obama

The original post showing this letter is here along with a video of Obama in 2007 stating that Executive Privilege should not be used to hide information from Congress.

[Update] Oversight Committee page on Fast and Furious investigation.


Fast And Furious: Obama Asserts Executive Privilege To Hide FF Documents From Oversight Committee

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

[Update] -Letter sent to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman asserting Executive Privilege on Fast and Furious documents, found here.

Holder's letter to Obama requesting that Obama assert Executive Privilege on Fast and Furious documents, found here and embedded below.

Michelle Malkin reminds readers, with a video of Barack Obama in 2007, where he told CNN that Executive Privilege should not be used to withhold information from Congress.






The morning of the scheduled Contempt of Congress vote against Attorney General Eric Holder for stonewalling the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee by refusing to present documents pertaining to Fast and Furious, Barack Obama sent the Committee a letter claiming Executive Privilege over those documents.

Representative Darrell Issa says the Contempt of Congress vote will continue as scheduled and Obama's actions are too little, too late.

The Committee will vote on the contempt resolution but Holder will not officially be held in Contempt of Congress until the full House approves the measure.

Obama's decision pertains to documents from February 2011 and afterward examining how Justice officials learned about the Fast and Furious probe.

Holder, in his letter to Obama, said those documents pertain to the "deliberative process" on how to respond to congressional and media inquiries.

Wednesday's developments follow a flurry of activity Tuesday, as Holder tried to negotiate a way to avert the contempt proceedings. Issa had earlier indicated a willingness to postpone the vote after Holder indicated a willingness to make compromises and supply some documents in response to House Republicans' subpoena.

But Issa told reporters after a roughly 20-minute meeting with Holder Tuesday that the attorney general instead briefed them on the documents in lieu of delivering them.

Issa told Fox News that Holder didn't provide "anything in writing," and said the family of murdered Border Patrol agent Brian Terry wants the documents as much as he does.

"We want the documents. Brian Terry's family would like the documents that are responsive to how in fact their son was gunned down with weapons that came from lawful dealers but at the ... behest of the Justice Department," Issa told Fox News.

Weapons from the Fast and Furious anti-gunrunning operation were found at Terry's murder scene.

The failed Fast and Furious operation attempted selling thousands of guns to arms dealers along the U.S.-Mexico border to trace them to leaders of drug cartels. However, many of them showed up in crime scenes.

Congressional investigators have been trying to determine if and when high-level Justice officials knew about problems with the operation.

Holder ran to Obama on Tuesday after meeting with Representative Issa when he realized the Contempt of Congress vote would continue as scheduled and Weds. morning is the first media reports stating that Obama had granted Holder's request to withhold the documents the House Oversight Committee needed to continue their investigation.

Holder's letter to Obama requesting that Obama assert Executive Privilege to prevent the oversight Committee from obtaining the Fast and Furious documents, below:


AG Letter to Obama
More:

Instead, in a 20-minute meeting that Holder himself had requested to stave off today’s planned contempt citation vote in Issa’s committee, he merely offered to “brief” Issa on their contents.

Holder’s insulting, 11th-hour offer came after he’d already missed a morning deadline to turn over the documents — a small percentage of the total number that Congress has demanded as it tries to get to the bottom of the scandal.

Issa surely feels like Charlie Brown charging the football, with Holder as Lucy. For over a year, he’s been trying to pin down the slippery AG, issuing one “last chance” after another, dragging Holder in front of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (on top of Senate appearances) and firing off angry letter after angry letter.

Each time, Holder has scampered off, meeting Issa’s legitimate demands with contempt — for the congressman, the Congress itself and the rule of law.

He tried it again yesterday after his offer was rebuffed, calling Issa’s demands “political gamesmanship” and cracking, “The ball’s in their court.”

Um . . . no, Mr. Attorney General. The ball’s in your court — and has been ever since Justice took the extraordinary step of formally “withdrawing” a Feb. 4, 2011 letter from assistant AG Ron Weich — who announced last week that he’s leaving Justice to become dean of the University of Baltimore law school.

Weich is just the latest F&F figure to jump ship, after ex-US Attorney for Arizona Dennis Burke and former acting head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Ken Melson.

Weich’s letter definitively denied allegations that the ATF, which supervised the F&F operation, “knowingly allowed the sale of assault weapons” to straw buyers acting on behalf of Mexican drug cartels.

Oops. In December, Holder told Congress that Weich’s letter was now inoperable, then promptly clammed up again, making it clear he has something — something big — to hide from Congress and the American people.

Which is why — unless he produces the documents before 10 a.m. this morning — Holder is looking at a House committee vote on contempt of Congress charges; once the full House goes along, he’ll be only the 11th official to be so cited since 1975.

Credit where it is due: Obama and Holder's Fast and Furious scandal was blown wide open by an investigative reporter for CBS News, Sharyl Attkisson, who has relentlessly reported on the failed operation.

[Update] Oversight Committee page on Fast and Furious investigation.


Embedded Letter Asserting Obama's Executive Privilege On Fast and Furious Documents

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

Eric Holder's letter requesting that Obama assert Executive Privilege over Fast and Furious Documents that the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee had issued a subpoena for, found here.

The original article on Obama asserting that privilege found here, along with a video of Obama from 2007 claiming Executive Privilege should not be used to withhold information from Congress.

 Below is a embeddable copy of the letter sent to the House Chairman asserting Executive Privilege on the Fast and Furious documents, sent on the day the Committee is scheduled to vote to hold Eric Holder in Contempt of Congress, in an attempt to forestall the Contempt vote.

Executive Privilege Letter


[Update] Oversight Committee page on Fast and Furious investigation.


Obama 2008 Criticizes Bush On Foreign Policy: Obama 2012, 'Don't Criticize Prez On Foreign Policy'

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

An article in Politico, titled "Obama warns Mitt Romney on foreign policy;" details Obama's remarks warning Mitt Romney supporters from criticizing him on Foreign Policy, claiming that Mitt Romney’s campaign advisers should quit criticizing him on foreign policy and that he thinks "traditionally the notion has been that America’s political differences end at the water’s edge."

So, while Obama sits in the White House there is some type of line drawn in the sand yet it was different when Obama, in 2008, was doing the very same thing?

 It took one Google search to bring up articles from 2008 which shows Obama as the hypocrite he is. WJS headline from 2008: "Obama Criticizes ‘Bush-McCain’ Cuba, Latin America Policy."

May 2008, via ABC News, headline "Obama takes issue with Bush foreign policy speech."

Those are just two examples of many showing that Barack Obama in 2008, while still a Senator who was trying to obtain the Democratic nomination to run for President had no problem offering Foreign Policy criticisms of a sitting President, yet now he is "warning" Romney campaign officials from daring to criticize him???

Hypocrite.

Reminder of this morning's hypocrisy from Obama as well, where in 2007, via video,  Obama claimed that Executive Privilege should not be used to hide information from Congress, yet he asserted it himself just this morning in an attempt to hide Fast and Furious documents from Congressional Oversight.



19 Haziran 2012 Salı

Health - Vaccinated children have up to 500% more disease than unvaccinated children

To contact us Click HERE
Vaccinated children have up to 500% more disease than unvaccinated children
Suspicions have been confirmed for those wary of vaccinating their children. A recent large study corroborates other independent study surveys comparing unvaccinated children to vaccinated children.

They all show that vaccinated children have two to five times more childhood diseases, illnesses, and allergies than unvaccinated children.

Originally, the recent still ongoing study compared unvaccinated children against a German national health survey conducted by KiGGS involving over 17,000 children up to age 19. This currently ongoing survey study was initiated by classical homoeopathist Andreas Bachmair.

However, the American connection for Bachmair's study can be found at VaccineInjury.info website that has added a link for parents of vaccinated children to participate in the study. So far this ongoing survey has well over 11,000 respondents, mostly from the U.S.A. Other studies have surveyed smaller groups of families.

Nevertheless, the results were similar. Of course, none of these studies were picked up by the MSM (mainstream media). None were funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or the World Health Organization (WHO) or any national or international health agency or medical profession group ( [link to healthimpactnews.com]

They don't dare compare the health of unvaccinated children to vaccinated children objectively and risk disrupting their vaxmania (vaccination mania). The focus for all the studies was mostly on childhood illnesses occurring as the children matured.

Learn more: [link to www.naturalnews.com] 
A German study released in September 2011 of about 8000 UNVACCINATED children, newborn to 19 years, show vaccinated children have at least 2 to 5 times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children.

The results are presented in the bar chart (See link below); the complete data and study results are here. The data is compared to the national German KIGGS health study of the children in the general population. Most of the respondents to the survey were from the U.S. (Chart here: [link to www.vaccineinjury.info] )

The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children via an internet questionnaire by vaccineinjury.info and Andreas Bachmair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner.

Source:
[link to healthimpactnews.com] 
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1902528/pg1

Border Patrol union: AG must resign

To contact us Click HERE

Border Patrol union: AG must resign

HOLDER'S REFUSAL TO RELEASE EMAILS IN FAST, FURIOUS QUERIES CITED
3Print EmailHolder appoints 2 US attorneys to lead leaks probe  Charles DharapakAttorney General Eric Holder testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2012, before the House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on the Justice Department. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)7 hours ago  •  (35) Comments

Related Links

  • Señor Reporter blog
The union that represents Border Patrol agents in Southern Arizona and around the country called Monday for U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to resign.The National Border Patrol Council cited Holder's alleged dishonesty about Operation Fast and Furious in making the call. That ATF-led operation put guns from Arizona in the hands of Mexican organized-crime groups, and two of those guns were found at the scene west of Rio Rico where Agent Brian Terry was shot to death in December 2010.The decision to ask Holder to step down came after more than a year of frustration about the Justice Department's handling of the controversial operation, said Shawn Moran, a vice president of the union who is based in the San Diego area. The department's failure to hand over emails that apparently pertain to Operation Fast and Furious to a House committee investigating the operation precipitated the call."This is something that all of our guys are concerned about because they know it could be any one of them," Moran said."We take the risks that are out there naturally just being in law enforcement working across from Mexico in the condition it's in right now," he said. "But what you can't accept is when your own government is allowing weapons into the hands of the people you're confronting."The Border Patrol is no longer part of the Justice Department but rather the Department of Homeland Security, headed by former Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano.In making the call, the union, which represents about 3,700 agents in Southern Arizona and 17,000 nationwide, joined more than 100 Republicans in the U.S. House. The Daily Caller, a conservative news outlet that has been polling members of Congress on Holder, reported Friday that 129 House members and five members of the Senate have asked Holder to resign. All are Republicans.The announcement also comes two days before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is scheduled to vote on whether to hold Holder in contempt of Congress for what they say is his refusal to respond adequately to subpoenas. However, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the chairman of the committee, has said he'll put off the contempt vote if the Justice Department hands over sufficient documents beforehand.The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Border Patrol union's call or the status of discussions with the Oversight Committee.http://azstarnet.com/news/local/border/border-patrol-union-ag-must-resign/article_cd3ceb03-621b-5db8-a157-683ba1c161f8.html

Look at the drops of water. It’s incredible! What A Picture!

To contact us Click HERE
What a picture ....
Look at the drops of water. It’s incredible!To those of you that do not speak or read French, We will translate it at the end.Merci
   QUELLE PHOTO!...
  
Regardez la goutte d'eau, c'est incroyable !...

> Une photo étonnante est devenue un message de foi en Espagne. > Cette photo a été prise au baptême de Valentino Mora, le fils d'Erica, une maman de 21 ans qui a demandé au photographe > de prendre une photo de son fils gratuitement.> La photo du baptême de Valentino Mora se trouve sur l'Internet, > parce qu'au moment ou le prêtre verse l'eau baptismale sur la tête de l'enfant, on voit les flux d'eau en forme d'un chapelet (voir la photo ci-dessus).> Cette histoire a commencé à la Paroisse de l'Assomption de Notre Dame dans Cordova, l'Espagne, où le baptême d'un bébé du mois a eu lieu. > Au moment où Valentino est venu pour recevoir le baptême, Erica a demandé au photographe Maria Silvana Salles, qui a été embauché par d'autres parents baptisant leurs bébés, de prendre une photo de son fils comme une faveur, puisque la jeune mère n'avait pas les moyens de payer. > La photographe, à la demande d'Erica, accepte > de prendre une photo de Valentino.> Maria Silvana avec une caméra traditionnelle a envoyé le film > à être développé à un magasin dans Cordova. > Quand elle a reçu les photos, > elle a remarqué avec la surprise > que l'eau versée sur la tête de Valentino était un chapelet parfait. > La photo du baptême de Valentino a éveillé la foi des gens de Cordova qui viennent à l'humble maison d'Erica et Valentino Mora pour le toucher. >  > La vérité est que ce signe de foi a mobilisé cette ville dans Cordova, > dont les voisins vont au magasin de Maria Silvana acheter la photo > comme si c'était une carte de prière.


Translation:
This picture has become a religious message of faith in Spain.
It was taken at the christen of Valentino Mora, son of Erica, a 21 year old mother that asked a photographer to take her son's picture for free.
When the priest poured the water over the baby’s head, you can see the form of a rosary beads. ( see the picture above )
The photographer was hired by other parents. Erica asked her as a favor, because she couldn’t afford to pay.
Maria Silvana has a traditional camera and send the film to be developed in a store in Cordova. When she received the pictures, she was surprisedto see the water poured over Valantino’s head was a perfect rosary beads.
This picture woke the neighborhood faith. The people of Cordova go to Erica’s house to touch the baby. This sign of faith mobilizes the town of Cordova, neighbors go to Maria’s store to buy the picture like a prayer card.

WORMHOLE / PORTAL TECHNOLOGY UNVEILED: UFOs opening and traveling thru wormholes are now seen across the world !

To contact us Click HERE
WORMHOLE / PORTAL TECHNOLOGY UNVEILED: UFOs opening and traveling thru wormholes are now seen across the world !
UFOs opening and traveling thru wormholes are now seen across the world.


Introduction by Apollo


A traveler noticed something from the corner of his eye, and he immediately stops to get out of his car, He is alarmed cause he sees what he thinks is a missile. but on more inspection he notices that its a cigar shaped ufo that is on fire ! Next to it is the whirling blades of a military copter. His eyes are riveted on the amazing scene. It appears that the helicopter responded to this ship in distress. Suddenly the persons eyes are drawn to another amazing sight, A yellow ring of light appears above them. It slowly opens like a ziplock bag. The cigar shaped craft that caught on fire flies thru the opening and then it closes up as suddenly as it appears. The helicopter, satisfied that the craft made it thru, procedes to fly away.


What are these wormholes that are being seen in the USA, Mexico and thruout Europe? Pictures are now coming in, all relating a similar story, " A wormhole, dimensional portal opens up with a ring of yellow or sometimes blue white light, a ufo flies thru it and then it closes" Sometimes, the air feels different or time feels like it has stopped, Observers have noticed a stillness of noise when the portal appears and the noises of traffic, or birds coming back after the portal has closed. Are these portals manipulating dimensional space time as well? Does it cause such a rip in linear time that it actually momentarily stops it? Is it called "Time distortion? Many researchers think so.

Another case history



A driver sees a bright light appearing over a shopping center parking lot. He is shocked and pulls in to get a closer look. This ring portal is shimmery with high energy and he can strangely see thru the center, like hes gazing into another world. It tries to close up , before expanding again, and then closes up before it completely vanishes.

He is pinching himself and in shock on what he had witnessed



-Apollo


portalsky


Qouting theories from the philadelphia experiment



I would hypothesise that whether one remains paralysed or mobile in the UFO time-field rather depends if your body is fully tuned to the specific field conditions, which again may randomly occur due to the hypotheticaldistribution of isobars of field strength. This field tuning immediately reminds one of the small boxes used tohold field position reportedly worn by the surviving participants in M.K. Jessup’s account of the Philadelphia experiment. After re-analyzing over 400 cases that I found during my research I've come to a very important conclusion about the actions of the UFO craft prior to its relationship to the soft spot opening.Whenever the case identifies the UFO craft at a standstill, motionless or not moving for a brief period of time and prior to its moving towards a flash of light, the slit opening, an invisible curtain in the sky or a portal.It appears to me that the craft is hesitating. Why? I speculate that it's waiting for the soft spot to arrive so it might depart through the opening.

[link to www.scribd.com]






Qoute:

Are Aliens Using Wormholes for Travel?

If aliens are visiting us here on Earth as many believe, the quickest way for them to reach us would be by travelling through wormholes from other parts of the Universe. Something which has sparked this idea is that recent sighting have been reported. The reports involve strange lights in the sky, which look like the end of a wormhole, with strange objects coming in and going out of them. Could this be UFOs flying in and out?

Some of the pictures and videos are stunning, and these can be easily found with a quick search of the internet. They vary in appearance, with some showing bright orange-yellow rings of light, others light spirals, and some long streaks of bright white light through the night sky. Many pictures are of wormholes alone, but some people have managed to capture images and videos of objects appearing out of these strange lights in the sky. These have been seen all over the world, in Mexico, England, America and various other countries.

Read more at Suite101: Wormholes: Alien Travel Passages to Earth? | Suite101.com [link to suite101.com]
Another case:



0/08/93 19:00 Kennewick, WA
If you can, imagine this; part of the sky opens, a metallic cigar shaped object darts out, stops, then exits at atremendous speed through an opening in the sky across from it, disappearing. That’s the best way to explain it. It happened so fast that if my crewman and I hadn't been looking we would have missed it completely. We had just completed work on a light on the snake river and were travelling by boat to the boat ramp behind one of the dams (I can't remember which one) it was just the two of us on the river and we were trying to reach the ramp before it got to dark. We both looked up to our 10 o'clock position at about position angle 30 degrees and this object appeared. I can't say with any certainty the distance or how big the object was, but it was close enough to see that it was dark grey and elongated (like a fat short cigar). We just looked at each other and said, "What the heck was that?" The trip back to Kennewick we tossed around ideas as to what it might be but ultimately failed to come up with anything. It was like the thing opened a hole inthe sky, entered our "realm", paused, and then left through another opening. There were no lights, no sound, no trailing vapour, no other aircraft, nothing. In fact if I hadn't been looking right at it I would have dismissed it altogether


[link to www.scribd.com] 
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1902855/pg1

Las Vegas Odds Maker comments on the election

To contact us Click HERE
Here is the comments from the LV odds maker.A little good news.  I sure hope he’s right.
http://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2012/05/30/why_obama_will_lose_in_a_landslide


A Las Vegas "odds maker" opines on why Obama will get "killed" by Romney in November.
Wayne Allyn RootMay 30, 2012Town hall Alerts
Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of predicting political races.

But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.

Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?
First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S. politics:
*Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Chris tians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.

*Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida ). This is not good news for Obama.

*Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel . Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama's Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60’s. This is not good news for Obama.

*Youth voters. Obama’s biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.

*Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won’t happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.

*Small Business owners.Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I'm a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to “give someone different a chance.” I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business...that he’d support unions over the private sector in a big way...that he'd overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn’t listen. Four years later, I can't find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.

*Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.

*Suburban moms. The issue isn’t contraception…it’s having a job to pay for contraception. Obama’s economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their children’s future. This is not good news for Obama.

*Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama.
Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying “I didn’t vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he’s done such a fantastic job, I can’t wait to vote for him today.” Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?
Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It's Reagan-Carter all over again.
But I’ll give Obama credit for one thing - he is living proof that familiarity breeds
contempt.

18 Haziran 2012 Pazartesi

Where Is The Outrage? -- Part II

To contact us Click HERE
By Findalis


Hat Tip once again to Texas Fred

Yesterday I posted Where Is The Outrage?  This is a follow-up once again posted by Texas Fred.
I had a dream the other night, I did not understand,
A figure walking through the mist, with flintlock in his hand.
His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood their by my bed,
He took off his three cornered hat, and speaking low, he said.

We fought a revolution to secure our Liberty,
We wrote the Constitution, as a shield from tyranny.
For future generations this legacy we gave,
In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

The freedom we secured for you, we hoped you’d always keep,
But tyrants labored endlessly, while your parents were asleep.
Your freedom gone – Your courage lost – You’re no more than a slave,
In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

You buy a permit to travel, and a permit to own a gun,
Permits to start a business or to build a place for one.
On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent,
Although you have no voice in choosing, how the money’s spent.

Your children must attend a school, that does not educate,
Your Christian values can’t be taught, according to the State.
You read about the current news in a regulated press,
You pay a tax you do not owe, to please the IRS.

Your money is no longer made of silver or of gold,
You trade your wealth for paper, so your life can be controlled.
You pay for crimes that make your nation, turn from G-d in shame,
You’ve taken Satans number, as you traded in your name.

You’ve given government control to those who do you harm,
So they can padlock churches, and steal the family farm.
And keep our country deep in debt,put men of G-d in jail,
Harass your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail.

Your public servants don’t uphold, the solemn oath they’ve sworn,
Your daughters visit doctors, so their children won’t be born.
Your leaders ship artillery and guns to foreign shores,
And send your sons to slaughter, to fight other peoples wars.

Can you regain your freedom, for which we fought and died,
Or don’t you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride.
Are there no more values, for which you would fight to save,
Or do you wish your children, to live in fear and be a slave.

Sons of the Republic, arise and take a stand,
Defend the Constitution, the supreme law of the land.
Preserve our great Republic, and teach each G-d given right,
And pray to G-d to keep the torch of freedom burning bright…
These are NOT just *words*, this is an inspiration!

When do We, The People, finally say ENOUGH! When do Americans STAND and fight for what is RIGHT? When do we stand and demand, and secure those blessings of liberty that this nation was founded upon?

I don’t refer to the *liberties* that Ron Paul and his ilk demand, free and legal drugs, I mean REAL liberty! Pride in ones nation and self! Am I beating a dead horse? Is there anyone out there, other than my loyal readers actually paying attention?

Do you remember the old typing drill from High School? Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country?

It’s time!

This piece was sent to me in the comments section of this post, Where is the outrage?, and it was just too good to leave in comments! Thank you Mr. Dick Robie!
Our anger has risen and we will not be satisfied until our liberties are restored and this Administration is investigated properly for their trouncing of our Freedom.


Obamacare A Win For Republicans No Matter What The Supreme Court Rules

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

Back in March the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)  found that Obama's signature achievement cost more than originally projected. New projections bring the cost to $1.76 trillion over the next decade instead of the original estimate of $940 billion.

Yesterday Rasmussen found that support for repealing Obamacare is growing, despite the massive PR the Obama campaign and Democrats are investing into it.

Most voters continue to support repeal of the national health care law and feel it will increase the federal budget deficit.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% are at least somewhat opposed. Those figures include 44% who Strongly Favor repeal and 28% who are Strongly Opposed.

Last week a New York Times/CBS News poll found that 68 percent of Americans want some or all of Obamacare overturned with only 24 percent wanting the entire law kept.

The Supreme Court is due to rule on the individual mandate's constitutionality this month and whether the mandate is severable without a severability clause inserted. (The severability clause was inserted into the law before passage but never made it into the final version that Obama signed)

Yesterday I noticed a piece over at Politico asking "Does Mitt Romney need Obamacare?"

There's fear in some GOP circles that if the court wipes the Affordable Care Act off the books Romney will lose a rallying point for the movement conservatives he has been struggling to inspire.

“Clearly, the Supreme Court overturning Obamacare is the best thing for the country, but it’s an open question what’s better for November’s election,” Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) said. If the law is upheld, he said, “it might drive our people out to the polls.”

More:

“Obamacare is the one permanent and potentially irreversible [effect] that Obama will have on the country, and if it is overturned, it makes the election, by default, less important,” a conservative operative intimately involved in the campaign who has reviewed extensive polling and focus group research on the topic told POLITICO earlier this week. “If the court overturns it, 10 million conservative activists suddenly breathe a great sigh of relief, and may not be quite as intensely active.”

I strongly disagree with that mindset as I have said multiple times here at Wake up America.

Yes, if the court rules in favor of the Obama administration and rules in favor of the health care law in it's entirety, Republicans and Romney can use the voter anger to "drive" conservative supporters to the polls, but  if the High Court overturns the mandate on constitutional grounds then Conservatives have a message just as intense to drive voters to the polls:

"The Supreme Court had to stop Barack Obama from violating American's constitutional rights"

Just the simple fact that this ruling on Obamacare, no matter which side it falls on, is happening a few short months before the November presidential election, putting Obamacare right into the spotlight again, is a win/win for Republicans.

And a lose/lose for Barack Obama.

Back in March a study of 10,000 simulations of a scenario in which all vulnerable Democrats voted against the health care bill and found that the rejections would have saved Democrats an average of 25 seats, which would have made the House parties close to a tie. (Republicans won 63 seats overall, but the study suggests around 25 of them would have been salvaged.)

 In 62 percent of the simulations, Democrats were able to keep the House. ( Source- Washington Post)

In 2010, American voters were able to make their voices heard and they severely punished House and Senate Democrats for passing Obamacare against the opposition of the majority of Americans, but Barack Obama was not on the ballot then.

He is in 2012 and since he pushed for Obamacare despite polling showing how unpopular it was as a whole, and ultimately it was his signature which signed it into law, then  his own assertion that voters should speak up at the polls in judgement, should be heeded.

In the words of Obama himself at the February 2010 Obamacare summit: "So the question that I'm going to ask myself and I ask of all of you is, is there enough serious effort that in a month's time or a few weeks' time or six weeks' time we could actually resolve something?"


And if we can't, then I think we've got to go ahead and make some decisions, and then that's what elections are for."

[WATCH]



Finally, something we can all agree on.



Another Day, Another Leak: Democrats Outraged Over Obama's Trade Lies

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

The leaked Trans-Pacific Partnership trade document will be embedded below the post.

Via Huffington Post, who highlights Barack Obama and Democrats' 2008 campaign promises:

The terms run contrary to campaign promises issued by Obama and the Democratic Party during the 2008 campaign.

"We will not negotiate bilateral trade agreements that stop the government from protecting the environment, food safety, or the health of its citizens; give greater rights to foreign investors than to U.S. investors; require the privatization of our vital public services; or prevent developing country governments from adopting humanitarian licensing policies to improve access to life-saving medications," reads the campaign document.

Now, Public Citizen has published a leaked document, showing, in Huffpo's own words, "nearly all of those vows are violated."

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Under the agreement currently being advocated by the Obama administration, American corporations would continue to be subject to domestic laws and regulations on the environment, banking and other issues. But foreign corporations operating within the U.S. would be permitted to appeal key American legal or regulatory rulings to an international tribunal. That international tribunal would be granted the power to overrule American law and impose trade sanctions on the United States for failing to abide by its rulings.

Liberals are not happy with Obama over this latest leak.


TPP Investment


Happy Father's Day!

To contact us Click HERE
By Findalis




It has been years since I lost my father, and there is not a day that goes by that I wish to hear his voice, listen to his wisdom, or get comforted by his embrace.

For those of you who still have your dads, give him a big hug and tell him that you love him.

For those Dads enjoy those ties, coffee cups, power tools, etc...   To your little ones you are their hero.




ObamaCare Home Sale Sales Tax

To contact us Click HERE

According to Fred Thompson, at Fred Thompson's America,  if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it! Yes, it was hidden away in the health care bill that the Democratic Congress chose to pass before anyone could discover the damning contents of ObamaCare!

Here's The Question and Fred's answer:

  . . .Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That’s $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It’s in the health care bill and goes into effect in 2013. Why 2013? Could it be to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? So, this is “change you can believe in”? Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax.If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Does this make your November and 2012 vote more important? Oh, you weren’t aware this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren’t alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren’t aware of it either.

A: That’s right. We’re finding out what’s in Obamacare. And don’t forget you pay that 3.8% even if you have no gain on the sale. And if you do have a gain your cap gains tax is going up from 15% to 20% PLUS the 3.8. Have a nice day AND VOTE

Technorati Tags: Real Estate,tax,sales tax,ObamaCare,Health Care,Bill,Homeowner,Home Sales,For Sale


17 Haziran 2012 Pazar

Another Day, Another Leak: Democrats Outraged Over Obama's Trade Lies

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

The leaked Trans-Pacific Partnership trade document will be embedded below the post.

Via Huffington Post, who highlights Barack Obama and Democrats' 2008 campaign promises:

The terms run contrary to campaign promises issued by Obama and the Democratic Party during the 2008 campaign.

"We will not negotiate bilateral trade agreements that stop the government from protecting the environment, food safety, or the health of its citizens; give greater rights to foreign investors than to U.S. investors; require the privatization of our vital public services; or prevent developing country governments from adopting humanitarian licensing policies to improve access to life-saving medications," reads the campaign document.

Now, Public Citizen has published a leaked document, showing, in Huffpo's own words, "nearly all of those vows are violated."

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Under the agreement currently being advocated by the Obama administration, American corporations would continue to be subject to domestic laws and regulations on the environment, banking and other issues. But foreign corporations operating within the U.S. would be permitted to appeal key American legal or regulatory rulings to an international tribunal. That international tribunal would be granted the power to overrule American law and impose trade sanctions on the United States for failing to abide by its rulings.

Liberals are not happy with Obama over this latest leak.


TPP Investment