17 Haziran 2012 Pazar

Dictator Decides Not To Enforce Laws

To contact us Click HERE
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Dictator Decides Not To Enforce LawsPosted By: LetFreedomRing
Date: Sunday, 17-Jun-2012 06:47:55

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/303037/are-we-revolutionary-times-victor-davis-hanson#
((snip))
Legally, President Obama has reiterated the principle that he can pick and choose which U.S. laws he wishes to enforce (see his decision to reverse the order of the Chrysler creditors, his decision not to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, and his administration’s contempt for national-security confidentiality and Senate and House subpoenas to the attorney general). If one individual can decide to exempt nearly a million residents from the law — when he most certainly could not get the law amended or repealed through proper legislative or judicial action — then what can he not do? Obama is turning out to be the most subversive chief executive in terms of eroding U.S. law since Richard Nixon.
>>>>>>>
Which begs the question IF we are in a post-Constitutional Presidency.
What other dictates will be forthcoming?
Will Obama become even more bold in ignoring Laws in the upcoming months ?
Will Congress be bold enough to protect our nation from this unlawful and shameful display of arrogance ? 

President Obama: The Biggest Government Spender In World

To contact us Click HERE
Peter Ferrara, ContributorI cover public policy, particularly concerning economics.Follow 
OP/ED 
|
 
6/14/2012 @ 3:42PM |175,435 views

President Obama: The Biggest Government Spender In World History

 165 comments, 21 called-out+ Comment nowThe U.S. has never before had a President who thinks so little of the American people that he imagines he can win re-election running on the opposite of reality. But that is the reality of President Obama today.Waving a planted press commentary, Obama recently claimed on the campaign stump, “federal spending since I took office has risen at the slowest pace of any President in almost 60 years.”Peggy Noonan aptly summarized in last weekend’s Wall Street Journal the take away by the still holding majority of Americans living in the real world:The Ongoing Disgrace That Is ObamanomicsSorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is CoolingHugo Chavez In Amerca: A 2nd Obama Term Means No Indepdendent JudiciaryPresident Obama's Unemployment Rate Is Stuck At 11%
“There is, now, a house-of-cards feel about this administration.  It became apparent some weeks ago when the President talked on the stump – where else? – about an essay by a fellow who said spending growth [under Obama] is actually lower than that of previous Presidents.  This was startling to a lot of people, who looked into it and found the man had left out most spending from 2009, the first year of Mr. Obama’s Presidency.  People sneered: The President was deliberately using a misleading argument to paint a false picture!  But you know, why would he go out there waiving an article that could immediately be debunked?  Maybe because he thought it was true.  That’s more alarming, isn’t it, the idea that he knows so little about the effects of his own economic program that he thinks he really is a low spender.”
What this shows most importantly is that the recognition is starting to break through to the general public regarding the President’s rhetorical strategy that I’ve have been calling Calculated Deception.  The latter is deliberately using a misleading argument to paint a false picture.  That has been a central Obama practice not only throughout his entire presidency, but also as the foundation of his 2008 campaign strategy, and actually throughout his whole career.Rest assured, Ms. Noonan, that the President is not as nuts as he may seem at times.  He knows very well that he is not a careful spender.  His whole mission is to transform the U.S. not into a Big Government country, but a Huge Government country, because only a country run by a Huge Government can be satisfactorily controlled by superior, all wise and beneficent individuals like himself.  That is why he is at minimum a Swedish socialist, if not worse.  Notice, though, how far behind the times he and his weak minded supporters are, as even the Swedes have abandoned Swedish socialism as a failure.The analysis by Internet commentator Rex Nutting on which Obama based his claim begins by telling us “What people forget (or never knew) is that the first year of every presidential term starts with a budget approved by the previous administration and Congress.”  Not exactly.The previous administration, or President, proposes a budget.  The previous Congress approves a budget.  And what Congress approves can be radically different from what the President proposes.As Art Laffer and Steve Moore showed in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, President Bush began a spending spree in his term that erased most of the gains in reduced government spending as a percent of GDP achieved by the Republican Congress in the 1990s led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, in conjunction with President Clinton.  But for fiscal year 2009, President Bush in February, 2008 proposed a budget with just a 3% spending increase over the prior year.  Fiscal year 2009 ran from October 1, 2008 until September 30, 2009.  President Obama’s term began on January 20, 2009.Recall, however, that in 2008 Congress was controlled by Democrat majorities, with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, and the restless Senator Obama already running for President, just four years removed from his glorious career as a state Senator in the Illinois legislature.  As Hans Bader reported on May 26 for the Washington Examiner, the budget approved and implemented by Pelosi, Obama and the rest of the Congressional Democrat majorities provided for a 17.9 percent increase in spending for fiscal 2009!Actually, President Obama and the Democrats were even more deeply involved in the fiscal 2009 spending explosion than that.  As Bader also reports, “The Democrat Congress [in 2008], confident Obama was going to win in 2008, passed only three of fiscal 2009’s 12 appropriations bills (Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and HomelandSecurity).  The Democrat Congress passed the rest of them [in 2009], and [President] Obama signed them.”  So Obama played a very direct role in the runaway fiscal 2009 spending explosion.Note as well that President Reagan didn’t just go along with the wild spending binge of the previous Democratic Congress for fiscal year 1981 when he came into office on January 20 of that year.  Almost no one remembers now the much vilified at the time 1981 Reagan budget cuts, his first major legislative initiative. Then Democrat Rep. Phil Gramm joined with Ohio Republican Del Latta to push through the Democratic House $31 billion in Reagan proposed budget cuts to the fiscal year 1981 budget, which totaled $681 billion, resulting in a cut of nearly 5% in that budget.  Obama could have done the exact same thing when he entered office in January, 2009, even more so with the Congress totally controlled by his own party at the time.Reagan then ramped up the spending cuts from there.  In nominal terms, non-defense discretionary spending actually declined by 7.1% from 1981 to 1982.  But roaring inflation at the time actually masks the true magnitude of the Reagan spending cut achievement.  In constant dollars, non-defense discretionary spending declined by 14.4% from 1981 to 1982, and by 16.8% from 1981 to 1983.  Moreover, in constant dollars, this non-defense discretionary spending never returned to its 1981 level for the rest of Reagan’s two terms!  By 1988, this spending was still down 14.4% from its 1981 level in constant dollars.http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/06/14/president-obama-the-biggest-government-spender-in-world-history/

Sanders Releases Explosive Bailout List

To contact us Click HERE

Sen. Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News




June 13, 2012
ore than $4 trillion in near zero-interest Federal Reserve loans and other financial assistance went to the banks and businesses of at least 18 current and former Federal Reserve regional bank directors in the aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse, according to Government Accountability Office records made public for the first time today by Sen. Bernie Sanders.On the eve of Senate testimony by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Sanders (I-Vt.) released the detailed findings on Dimon and other Fed board members whose banks and businesses benefited from Fed actions.A Sanders provision in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Actrequired the Government Accountability Office to investigate potential conflicts of interest. The Oct. 19, 2011 report by the non-partisan investigative arm of Congress laid out the findings, but did not name names. Sanders today released the names."This report reveals the inherent conflicts of interest that exist at the Federal Reserve.  At a time when small businesses could not get affordable loans to create jobs, the Fed was providing trillions in secret loans to some of the largest banks and corporations in America that were well represented on the boards of the Federal Reserve Banks.  These conflicts must end," Sanders said.The GAO study found that allowing members of the banking industry to both elect and serve on the Federal Reserve's board of directors creates "an appearance of a conflict of interest" and poses "reputational risks" to the Federal Reserve System.In Dimon's case, JPMorgan received some $391 billion of the $4 trillion in emergency Fed funds at the same time his bank was used by the Fed as a clearinghouse for emergency lending programs. In March of 2008, the Fed provided JPMorgan with $29 billion in financing to acquire Bear Stearns. Dimon also got the Fed to provide JPMorgan Chase with an 18-month exemption from risk-based leverage and capital requirements. And he convinced the Fed to take risky mortgage-related assets off of Bear Stearns balance sheet before JP Morgan Chase acquired the troubled investment bank.Another high-profile conflict involved Stephen Friedman, the former chairman of the New York Fed's board of directors. Late in 2008, the New York Fed approved an application from Goldman Sachs to become a bank holding company giving it access to cheap loans from the Federal Reserve. During that period, Friedman sat on the Goldman Sachs board.  He also owned Goldman stock, something that was prohibited by Federal Reserve conflict of interest regulations. Although it was not publicly disclosed at the time, Friedman received a waiver from the Fed's conflict of interest rules in late 2008. Unbeknownst to the Fed, Friedman continued to purchase shares in Goldman from November 2008 through January of 2009, according to the GAO.In another case, General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt was a New York Fed board member at the same time GE helped create a Commercial Paper Funding Facility during the financial crisis. The Fed later provided $16 billion in financing to GE under this emergency lending program.Sanders on May 22 introduced legislation to prohibit banking industry and business executives from serving as directors of the 12 Federal Reserve regional banks.To read a report summarizing the new GAO information, click here.

Jamie Dimon Is Not Alone

During the financial crisis, at least 18 former and current directors from Federal Reserve Banks worked in banks and corporations that collectively received over $4 trillion in low-interest loans from the Federal Reserve.US Senator Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.)Washington, DCJune 12, 2012
  1. Jamie Dimon, the Chairman and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, has served on the Board of Directors at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York since 2007. During the financial crisis, the Fed provided JP Morgan Chase with $391 billion in total financial assistance. JP Morgan Chase was also used by the Fed as a clearinghouse for the Fed's emergency lending programs.In March of 2008, the Fed provided JP Morgan Chase with $29 billion in financing to acquire Bear Stearns. During the financial crisis, the Fed provided JP Morgan Chase with an 18-month exemption from risk-based leverage and capital requirements. The Fed also agreed to take risky mortgage-related assets off of Bear Stearns balance sheet before JP Morgan Chase acquired this troubled investment bank.
  2. Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, served on the New York Fed's Board of Directors from 2006-2011. General Electric received $16 billion in low-interest financing from the Federal Reserve’s Commercial Paper Funding Facility during this time period.
  3. Stephen Friedman. In 2008, the New York Fed approved an application from Goldman Sachs to become a bank holding company giving it access to cheap Fed loans. During the same period, Friedman, who was chairman of the New York Fed at the time, sat on the Goldman Sachs board of directors and owned Goldman stock, something the Fed’s rules prohibited. He received a waiver in late 2008 that was not made public. After Friedman received the waiver, he continued to purchase stock in Goldman from November 2008 through January of 2009 unbeknownst to the Fed, according to the GAO. During the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs received $814 billion in total financial assistance from the Fed.
  4. Sanford Weill, the former CEO of Citigroup, served on the Fed's Board of Directors in New York in 2006. During the financial crisis, Citigroup received over $2.5 trillion in total financial assistance from the Fed.
  5. Richard Fuld, Jr, the former CEO of Lehman Brothers, served on the Fed's Board of Directors in New York from 2006 to 2008. During the financial crisis, the Fed provided $183 billion in total financial assistance to Lehman before it collapsed.
  6. James M. Wells, the Chairman and CEO of SunTrust Banks, has served on the Board of Directors at the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta since 2008. During the financial crisis, SunTrust received $7.5 billion in total financial assistance from the Fed.
  7. Richard Carrion, the head of Popular Inc. in Puerto Rico, has served on the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York since 2008. Popular received $1.2 billion in total financing from the Fed's Term Auction Facility during the financial crisis.
  8. James Smith, the Chairman and CEO of Webster Bank, served on the Federal Reserve's Board of Directors in Boston from 2008-2010. Webster Bank received $550 million in total financing from the Federal Reserve's Term Auction Facility during the financial crisis.
  9. Ted Cecala, the former Chairman and CEO of Wilmington Trust, served on the Fed's Board of Directors in Philadelphia from 2008-2010. Wilmington Trust received $3.2 billion in total financial assistance from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.
  10. Robert Jones, the President and CEO of Old National Bancorp, has served on the Fed's Board of Directors in St. Louis since 2008. Old National Bancorp received a total of $550 million in low-interest loans from the Federal Reserve's Term Auction Facility during the financial crisis.
  11. James Rohr, the Chairman and CEO of PNC Financial Services Group, served on the Fed's Board of Directors in Cleveland from 2008-2010. PNC received $6.5 billion in low-interest loans from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.
  12. George Fisk, the CEO of LegacyTexas Group, was a director at the Dallas Federal Reserve in 2009. During the financial crisis, his firm received a $5 million low-interest loan from the Federal Reserve's Term Auction Facility.
  13. Dennis Kuester, the former CEO of Marshall & Ilsley, served as a board director on the Chicago Federal Reserve from 2007-2008. During the financial crisis, his bank received over $21 billion in low-interest loans from the Fed.
  14. George Jones, Jr., the CEO of Texas Capital Bank, has served as a board director at the Dallas Federal Reserve since 2009. During the financial crisis, his bank received $2.3 billion in total financing from the Fed's Term Auction Facility.
  15. Douglas Morrison, was the Chief Financial Officer at CitiBank in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, while he served as a board director at the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank in 2006. During the financial crisis, CitiBank in Sioux Falls, South Dakota received over $21 billion in total financing from the Federal Reserve.
  16. L. Phillip Humann, the former CEO of SunTrust Banks, served on the Board of Directors at the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta from 2006-2008. During the financial crisis, SunTrust received $7.5 billion in total financial assistance from the Fed.
  17. Henry Meyer, III, the former CEO of KeyCorp, served on the Board of Directors at the Federal Reserve Bank in Cleveland from 2006-2007. During the financial crisis, KeyBank (owned by KeyCorp) received over $40 billion in total financing from the Federal Reserve.
  18. Ronald Logue, the former CEO of State Street Corporation, served as a board member of the Boston Federal Reserve Bank from 2006-2007. During the financial crisis, State Street Corporation received a total of $42 billion in financing from the Federal Reserve.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/11895-sanders-releases-explosive-bailout-list?tmpl=component&print=1&page=
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1339778838

49 STATE AG SETTLEMENT WEBINAR WELLS FARGO, JP MORGAN ETC

To contact us Click HERE
Subject: 49 STATE AG SETTLEMENT WEBINAR WELLS FARGO, JP MORGAN ETC
The settlement between 49 states and the federal government with 5 of the largest mortgage servicers - Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Ally - provides direct financial relief to borrowers and former homeowners, cash payments to the states and the federal government, and imposes new standards on the servicing loans in foreclosure
Subject: 49 STATE AG SETTLEMENT WEBINAR MONDAY AND TUESDAY
49 STATE AG SETTLEMENT WEBINAR MONDAY AND Tuesday
Dear Members,
Dawn has found a beauty……Amber Villa, from the Mass AG's office who works on foreclosures, is going to be one of the presenters at a webinar next week. You can attend Monday and/or Tuesday by using the links below. The webinar is given by the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) will archived on the NCLC website if you miss the webinar. This could be very educational for us all as Amber Villa is the person most likely to end up with our recent complaint…….so we will be able to get a read on her present mind set. 
Don't be surprised if she is pushing modifications for the banks. It should be interesting.
Chris__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Take notice that.........................This webinar will provide an overview and update legal advocates on the essential terms of the settlement. Presenters: Assistant Attorneys General Phil Lehman of North Carolina as well as Christopher Barry-Smith and Amber Anderson Villa of the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General.
If you have signed up for the National Elder Rights Training Project email list, you will receive an invitation to join this webinar on Monday, June 18. Not on that email list but wish to receive an invitation to participate in this webinar? Please submit your email address.
From: National Consumer Law Center Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:10 PMTo Subject: Consumer Alert for Elder Advocates plus Mortgage Webinar Announcement
To print please Click here

Hello you are receiving this email because you are a subscriber of "Consumer Alerts for Elder Advocates." This upcoming webinar may be of interest to you.


June 14, 2012

Save the Date: Free Webinar next Tuesday, June 19 at 2PM EST

Update on the National Mortgage Settlement for Legal Advocates

The settlement between 49 states and the federal government with 5 of the largest mortgage servicers - Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Ally - provides direct financial relief to borrowers and former homeowners, cash payments to the states and the federal government, and imposes new standards on the servicing loans in foreclosure. This webinar will provide an overview and update legal advocates on the essential terms of the settlement. Presenters: Assistant Attorneys General Phil Lehman of North Carolina as well as Christopher Barry-Smith and Amber Anderson Villa of the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General. If you have signed up for the National Elder Rights Training Project email list, you will receive an invitation to join this webinar on Monday, June 18. Not on that email list but wish to receive an invitation to participate in this webinar? Please submit your email address. Please share this e-alert with others. This webinar will be archived on NCLCs website. You can download the presentation after its completion at: http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001PPsxXmnBSDQ4nBJI4nxBmNKKxMrcb3RncxoariBM5bfaGilQADYSbrysZc1c3kV83vFmeskmCDRB3BT6XqGXkBtzNScG0ShsNc63vdh7-BcrLAxST9ia3a274ru28V8RPYShp37KNAZSLb1b7rX8TRLQUOS3yoLVYNfjYAVPyMdu5crh-5vXpGoBXUuUIqQb1lJNcCFiIAM= Other webinars conducted as part of the National Elder Rights Training Project are also available for review.
Free case consultation for elder advocates is provided by the National Senior Citizens Law Center and NCLC through the National Legal Resource Center (http://www.nlrc.aoa.gov/)

Foreclsure - state tax exemption: home property

To contact us Click HERE
NOT LEGAL ADVICE AND NOT TAX ADVICE

I took a break last night and went out dancing and discussed a
situation with someone I dance with. She has a rental home she
wants to just let go. This reminded me of something some of you
may not realize.

Most states, not all, have a tax exemption for your primary
residence. Arizona currently does but the law may change some. I
don't know of any state that has the exemption for a second and/or
rental property. This is a big deal.


Lets say your rental property has a mortgage for $200,000 and you
let it get foreclosed on. The bank sells it for $100,000. The bank
will send the info to the IRS. The IRS will consider that you had
a $100,000 "windfall." It will be taxed at 50% and the tax is due
immediately. If you don't know, immediately they start charging
interests and penalties.

Instead of owing $50,000 you will soon owe $100,000 +. If you have
more than one rental property, keep adding.


The bank will make you an offer wherein they will claim
that they won't report the foreclosure to the IRS if you don't
fight. BULL!!! Its not their choice and you can bet they will report
the foreclosure no matter what they promise, and there is nothing you
can do about them lying to you because it would be a fraudulent deal.


I have seen this scenario happen more times than I can count. Every
time the people were wiped out financially and will probably never
recover. BK won't always save you from this mess.


I believe this was part of the plan, and this whole thing was
planned, from the very beginning.


The point was really about what to do with about your property. My
answer is the same as it always is. Fight for the truth, keep
fighting for the truth and fight for nothing else.


The truth is there is no VALID mortgage, it was all a lie, every
bit of it. The truth is the property is paid in full and you own it.


But they will lie in court, which means liars will be listening
to them, and liars like lies and other liars; and hate the truth
even more than you do. Our system was created from the truth. The
people in our system are nothing but liars and got there because
the other liars wanted more liars. They won't even let people in
the system who aren't liars anymore.


Your only intelligent option is to fight, and keep fighting. Maybe
it will teach you to fight for the truth as I have for 4 decades
now. I am nt saying it will work r will be fun, I am just saying
maybe you will learn is better to die fighting for the truth than
living for the lie.


Nough said.



http://foreclosuresecretsblog.com
www. notary complain.com

John C.  Stuart, aka Mobius Nemesi
4101 W. Union Hills Dr. #1043 Glendale, Arizona (85308)

Baltic ‘UFO’: New dive, new details (PHOTOS)

To contact us Click HERE

Baltic ‘UFO’: New dive, new details (PHOTOS)

Get short URL email story to a friend print version Published: 17 June, 2012, 09:58
Image from vaghauk.deviantart.comImage from vaghauk.deviantart.comTAGS: Space, Europe
A “UFO-shaped” object, found at the bottom of the Baltic Sea last year, has puzzled many. And a Swedish expedition that plunged into the deep eventually surfaced with more questions than answers.
­Covered in soot, with little “fireplace”-like structures and lying at the end of a 300-meter “runway” – this is not something you would expect to find sitting on the sea floor. And whatever you think about extraterrestrial life, “the thing” is still there and there has to be an explanation. So what could it be?
On June 19, 2011, a team of Swedish treasure hunters was exploring the bottom of the Baltic Sea with their sonars when they noticed a bizarre, disc-like structure at a depth of 90 meters. Back then, international experts failed to explain the sonar images. In 2012, after months of preparation, the Ocean X Team, as they call themselves, went back in order to unveil the mystery.

Read the rest of the article at:
http://www.rt.com/news/baltic-sea-ufo-object-007/

NESARA–Our Worldwide Declaration of Indepednence

To contact us Click HERE
               Hello All:
                      People all over the world are wanting Nesara NOW. Read about the others.
                                 God Bless   Love to all Smile Red rose Red heart 

              Nancy Dettweiler: NESARA – Our Worldwide Declaration of Independence

NESARA–Our Worldwide Declaration of Indepednence

Posted on June 16, 2012 by Nancy B. Detweiler, M.Ed., M.Div.Whether or not NESARA was actually signed into law by the Clinton administration, it represents the will of the people worldwide. NESARA is the 2012 version of America’s 1776 Declaration of Independence.
Gaia—or Planet Earth—will undergo tremendous changes during the remainder of 2012 and beyond. Becoming familiar with some of the major concepts behind this transformation will allow us to discern truth and participate wisely.
During the 40+ weekly demonstrations for NESARA in front of the Peace Palace, Hague, Netherlands, NESARA Take Action Groups requested—from the countries of the world—banners announcing their support. This banner is from New Zealand. Additional banners may be seen at: http://www.pathwaytoascension.com/nesara.html#photos
NESARA, as the 2012 worldwide version of America’s Declaration of Independence, reiterates the demand of the people of the world—that their unalienable (God-given) Rights to Life, Liberty, & the Pursuit of Happiness be recognized and all impediments to the unfolding of these Rights be removed.
As excitement builds in anticipation of the sweeping changes emerging on our planet, I call your attention to the following articles.
http://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/a-galactic-society-the-fulfillment-of-the-american-declaration-of-independence/
http://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/2011/01/05/the-u-s-declaration-of-independence-nesara/
You may find more articles relating to NESARA on my blog: http://pathwaytoascension.wordpress.com/.
Steve Beckow has listed additional articles on NESARA on his 2012 Scenario website: http://the2012scenario.com/2012/06/prudent-caution-and-encouragement-to-study-nesara/ Many of Steve’s articles include information from our galactic family relating to NESARA.
Gathering information on NESARA as our worldwide Declaration of Independence magnifies greatly the energetic field around the concepts contained therein and thereby assists in building Earth’s Golden Age!