Where Is The Outrage? -- Part II

To contact us Click HERE
By Findalis


Hat Tip once again to Texas Fred

Yesterday I posted Where Is The Outrage?  This is a follow-up once again posted by Texas Fred.

I had a dream the other night, I did not understand,
A figure walking through the mist, with flintlock in his hand.
His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood their by my bed,
He took off his three cornered hat, and speaking low, he said.

We fought a revolution to secure our Liberty,
We wrote the Constitution, as a shield from tyranny.
For future generations this legacy we gave,
In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

The freedom we secured for you, we hoped you’d always keep,
But tyrants labored endlessly, while your parents were asleep.
Your freedom gone – Your courage lost – You’re no more than a slave,
In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave.

You buy a permit to travel, and a permit to own a gun,
Permits to start a business or to build a place for one.
On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent,
Although you have no voice in choosing, how the money’s spent.

Your children must attend a school, that does not educate,
Your Christian values can’t be taught, according to the State.
You read about the current news in a regulated press,
You pay a tax you do not owe, to please the IRS.

Your money is no longer made of silver or of gold,
You trade your wealth for paper, so your life can be controlled.
You pay for crimes that make your nation, turn from G-d in shame,
You’ve taken Satans number, as you traded in your name.

You’ve given government control to those who do you harm,
So they can padlock churches, and steal the family farm.
And keep our country deep in debt,put men of G-d in jail,
Harass your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail.

Your public servants don’t uphold, the solemn oath they’ve sworn,
Your daughters visit doctors, so their children won’t be born.
Your leaders ship artillery and guns to foreign shores,
And send your sons to slaughter, to fight other peoples wars.

Can you regain your freedom, for which we fought and died,
Or don’t you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride.
Are there no more values, for which you would fight to save,
Or do you wish your children, to live in fear and be a slave.

Sons of the Republic, arise and take a stand,
Defend the Constitution, the supreme law of the land.
Preserve our great Republic, and teach each G-d given right,
And pray to G-d to keep the torch of freedom burning bright…

These are NOT just *words*, this is an inspiration!

When do We, The People, finally say ENOUGH! When do Americans STAND and fight for what is RIGHT? When do we stand and demand, and secure those blessings of liberty that this nation was founded upon?

I don’t refer to the *liberties* that Ron Paul and his ilk demand, free and legal drugs, I mean REAL liberty! Pride in ones nation and self! Am I beating a dead horse? Is there anyone out there, other than my loyal readers actually paying attention?

Do you remember the old typing drill from High School? Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country?

It’s time!

This piece was sent to me in the comments section of this post, Where is the outrage?, and it was just too good to leave in comments! Thank you Mr. Dick Robie!

Our anger has risen and we will not be satisfied until our liberties are restored and this Administration is investigated properly for their trouncing of our Freedom.

Obamacare A Win For Republicans No Matter What The Supreme Court Rules

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

Back in March the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)  found that Obama's signature achievement cost more than originally projected. New projections bring the cost to $1.76 trillion over the next decade instead of the original estimate of $940 billion.

Yesterday Rasmussen found that support for repealing Obamacare is growing, despite the massive PR the Obama campaign and Democrats are investing into it.

Most voters continue to support repeal of the national health care law and feel it will increase the federal budget deficit.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% are at least somewhat opposed. Those figures include 44% who Strongly Favor repeal and 28% who are Strongly Opposed.

Last week a New York Times/CBS News poll found that 68 percent of Americans want some or all of Obamacare overturned with only 24 percent wanting the entire law kept.

The Supreme Court is due to rule on the individual mandate's constitutionality this month and whether the mandate is severable without a severability clause inserted. (The severability clause was inserted into the law before passage but never made it into the final version that Obama signed)

Yesterday I noticed a piece over at Politico asking "Does Mitt Romney need Obamacare?"

There's fear in some GOP circles that if the court wipes the Affordable Care Act off the books Romney will lose a rallying point for the movement conservatives he has been struggling to inspire.

“Clearly, the Supreme Court overturning Obamacare is the best thing for the country, but it’s an open question what’s better for November’s election,” Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) said. If the law is upheld, he said, “it might drive our people out to the polls.”

More:

“Obamacare is the one permanent and potentially irreversible [effect] that Obama will have on the country, and if it is overturned, it makes the election, by default, less important,” a conservative operative intimately involved in the campaign who has reviewed extensive polling and focus group research on the topic told POLITICO earlier this week. “If the court overturns it, 10 million conservative activists suddenly breathe a great sigh of relief, and may not be quite as intensely active.”

I strongly disagree with that mindset as I have said multiple times here at Wake up America.

Yes, if the court rules in favor of the Obama administration and rules in favor of the health care law in it's entirety, Republicans and Romney can use the voter anger to "drive" conservative supporters to the polls, but  if the High Court overturns the mandate on constitutional grounds then Conservatives have a message just as intense to drive voters to the polls:

"The Supreme Court had to stop Barack Obama from violating American's constitutional rights"

Just the simple fact that this ruling on Obamacare, no matter which side it falls on, is happening a few short months before the November presidential election, putting Obamacare right into the spotlight again, is a win/win for Republicans.

And a lose/lose for Barack Obama.

Back in March a study of 10,000 simulations of a scenario in which all vulnerable Democrats voted against the health care bill and found that the rejections would have saved Democrats an average of 25 seats, which would have made the House parties close to a tie. (Republicans won 63 seats overall, but the study suggests around 25 of them would have been salvaged.)

 In 62 percent of the simulations, Democrats were able to keep the House. ( Source- Washington Post)

In 2010, American voters were able to make their voices heard and they severely punished House and Senate Democrats for passing Obamacare against the opposition of the majority of Americans, but Barack Obama was not on the ballot then.

He is in 2012 and since he pushed for Obamacare despite polling showing how unpopular it was as a whole, and ultimately it was his signature which signed it into law, then  his own assertion that voters should speak up at the polls in judgement, should be heeded.

In the words of Obama himself at the February 2010 Obamacare summit: "So the question that I'm going to ask myself and I ask of all of you is, is there enough serious effort that in a month's time or a few weeks' time or six weeks' time we could actually resolve something?"


And if we can't, then I think we've got to go ahead and make some decisions, and then that's what elections are for."

[WATCH]



Finally, something we can all agree on.

Another Day, Another Leak: Democrats Outraged Over Obama's Trade Lies

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

The leaked Trans-Pacific Partnership trade document will be embedded below the post.

Via Huffington Post, who highlights Barack Obama and Democrats' 2008 campaign promises:

The terms run contrary to campaign promises issued by Obama and the Democratic Party during the 2008 campaign.

"We will not negotiate bilateral trade agreements that stop the government from protecting the environment, food safety, or the health of its citizens; give greater rights to foreign investors than to U.S. investors; require the privatization of our vital public services; or prevent developing country governments from adopting humanitarian licensing policies to improve access to life-saving medications," reads the campaign document.

Now, Public Citizen has published a leaked document, showing, in Huffpo's own words, "nearly all of those vows are violated."

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Under the agreement currently being advocated by the Obama administration, American corporations would continue to be subject to domestic laws and regulations on the environment, banking and other issues. But foreign corporations operating within the U.S. would be permitted to appeal key American legal or regulatory rulings to an international tribunal. That international tribunal would be granted the power to overrule American law and impose trade sanctions on the United States for failing to abide by its rulings.

Liberals are not happy with Obama over this latest leak.


TPP Investment

Happy Father's Day!

To contact us Click HERE
By Findalis




It has been years since I lost my father, and there is not a day that goes by that I wish to hear his voice, listen to his wisdom, or get comforted by his embrace.

For those of you who still have your dads, give him a big hug and tell him that you love him.

For those Dads enjoy those ties, coffee cups, power tools, etc...   To your little ones you are their hero.

ObamaCare Home Sale Sales Tax

To contact us Click HERE

According to Fred Thompson, at Fred Thompson's America,  if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it! Yes, it was hidden away in the health care bill that the Democratic Congress chose to pass before anyone could discover the damning contents of ObamaCare!

Here's The Question and Fred's answer:

  . . .Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it? That’s $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc. When did this happen? It’s in the health care bill and goes into effect in 2013. Why 2013? Could it be to come to light AFTER the 2012 elections? So, this is “change you can believe in”? Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax.If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Does this make your November and 2012 vote more important? Oh, you weren’t aware this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren’t alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren’t aware of it either.

A: That’s right. We’re finding out what’s in Obamacare. And don’t forget you pay that 3.8% even if you have no gain on the sale. And if you do have a gain your cap gains tax is going up from 15% to 20% PLUS the 3.8. Have a nice day AND VOTE

Technorati Tags: Real Estate,tax,sales tax,ObamaCare,Health Care,Bill,Homeowner,Home Sales,For Sale

Another Day, Another Leak: Democrats Outraged Over Obama's Trade Lies

To contact us Click HERE
By Susan Duclos

The leaked Trans-Pacific Partnership trade document will be embedded below the post.

Via Huffington Post, who highlights Barack Obama and Democrats' 2008 campaign promises:

The terms run contrary to campaign promises issued by Obama and the Democratic Party during the 2008 campaign.

"We will not negotiate bilateral trade agreements that stop the government from protecting the environment, food safety, or the health of its citizens; give greater rights to foreign investors than to U.S. investors; require the privatization of our vital public services; or prevent developing country governments from adopting humanitarian licensing policies to improve access to life-saving medications," reads the campaign document.

Now, Public Citizen has published a leaked document, showing, in Huffpo's own words, "nearly all of those vows are violated."

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Under the agreement currently being advocated by the Obama administration, American corporations would continue to be subject to domestic laws and regulations on the environment, banking and other issues. But foreign corporations operating within the U.S. would be permitted to appeal key American legal or regulatory rulings to an international tribunal. That international tribunal would be granted the power to overrule American law and impose trade sanctions on the United States for failing to abide by its rulings.

Liberals are not happy with Obama over this latest leak.


TPP Investment

A Drop Of 22 Points In New York!

To contact us Click HERE
By Findalis

That is what the latest poll shows President Barack Hussein Obama's numbers in the latest poll conducted by Siena College.

President Obama's support among Jewish voters in the state of New York has dropped 22 percentage points in only a month, according to the results of a just released poll.

The poll, conducted by Siena College, finds that currently President Obama has the support of 51 percent of Jewish voters, while 43 percent are opposed to him. Five percent are undecided. That means, Obama's lead among Jewish voters is at 8 percentage points.

Previously, in Siena's May poll, Obama had the support 62 percent of Jewish New Yorkers, while 32 percent opposed him. That means, last month, Obama's lead among this group of voters was at a strong 30 percentage points.

Those polled were responding to this straight forward question: "If the election for President were held today, who would you vote for if the candidates were [Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, or Don't know]?

Additionally, Jewish voters in New York overwhelmingly believe that America is "headed in the wrong direction" as opposed to "the right track," by a margin of 62 percent to 31 percent.

Perhaps most troubling for President Obama's prospects with Jewish voters were these two questions. "Overall, would you say that you and your family are better off now than you were four years ago, about the same as you were four years ago, or worse off today than you were four years ago?," the poll asked. Only 13 percent of Jewish New Yorkers said that they are better off now, under Obama, while 41 percent said that they are doing worse. (Forty-five percent said they're doing the same.)

And this one: "And how about the country as a whole, Would you say that the United States is in better position now than it was four years ago, about the same as it was four years ago, or worse off today than it was four years ago?" Only 27 percent of Jewish New Yorkers said that the U.S. is in a better position, while 49 percent said America's position is worse. (Twenty-two percent said the position of this country has not changed.)

Source

Now while the Tribe might not vote for Obama, it is not a vote for Romney either.  The same thing happened in 1980.  While many members of the Tribe didn't vote for Carter, they didn't vote for Anderson or Reagan either.  Bugs Bunny got 25% of the Jewish vote (Always vote for the member of the Tribe.).

And now it looks as if the Democrats are getting ready to lose Jewish support (money).

New York City councilman Charles Barron may be on his way to winning the Democratic nomination for Congress in New York's Eighth District, despite a history of racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Israel rhetoric. Barron, who has earned the support of retiring congressman Edolphus Towns, would be representing a district with a sizable Jewish population.

In 2010, he told a reporter that in New York's Crown Heights neighborhood, Jews "only make up 20 percent of the population, but they've always walked these streets as if they owned them, and acted as if they are the only ones in the community that matter."

Barron once referred to a fellow city councilman, who is Jewish, as a "coward" whose actions on the council were to "satisfy the Jewish lobby."

Barron has also called into question the legitimate existence of Israel. "Where should we start [the discussion]?" he said at a Brooklyn church in 2010. "Should we start with the 1906 Zionist Convention, or in 1914, with the Balfour Declaration? With Menachem Begin, the terrorists, all the wars, you want to discuss Israel becoming a state in 1948 when it should not have? Who are the terrorists? You want to talk about the definition of terrorism? How do you define acts of piracy?"

And in 2009, Barron joined former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney on a Viva Palestine convoy to undermine the Israeli blockade of Hamas-controlled Gaza, which he has compared to a "concentration death camp." Here's what Barron had to say in 2010 about the blockade:

Israel is out of control. They’re off the hook, they’re out of line; and Barack Obama has to stand strong and so do does Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, to say that this kind of aggressive, terroristic behavior and act of piracy will not be tolerated and the blockade should be lifted immediately, immediately. There’s too many children and women and innocent men of Gaza dying because you’re isolating them and not allowing anything in. It’s like having a concentration death camp. It’s horrible, and the whole world is and should be outraged.

The New York Daily News ran an editorial this weekend warning voters about Barron's views:

A relic of a bitter bygone era, Barron is a former Black Panther who plays a one-note trumpet of racial grievance.


He has called for training teachers in Ebonics. He has labeled housing development “a new wave of Jim Crowism.”


At a 2002 rally in support of reparations for slavery, he said: “I want to go up to the closest white person and say, ‘You can’t understand this, it’s a black thing’ and then slap him, just for my mental health.”

The Daily News instead endorsed Hakeem Jeffries in the June 26 primary. The seat is highly Democratic, and a win in the primary will be tantamount to a general election victory. The Daily News touts Jeffries "in the strongest terms," citing his legal work and his ability to bridge racial and cultural differences across the new diverse district.

Source

Add the anti-Semitic campaign of Bill Pascrell and the Democrats in the Congressional Black Caucus.  And Jews are fleeing the Democratic Party.

Obama has a big problem.  He has a Jewish problem.  He has a big problem with Jewish money, he can't raise any.  I suspect that in November he will get only 12% of the Jewish vote.  G-d willing!